Legal research

Court Judgments

Search judgments by case, court, year, lawyer or summary.

Showing 2,941–2,960 of 12,680 judgments

  1. NYASHA PHIRI CHISANGO Versus THE STATE

    Chinhoyi High Court · HCC36-23 · 07 2023

    The accused person was aged 20 years, when he was tried and convicted of 2 counts of rape on a minor girl then aged 9 years, in 2022. He was sentenced to an effective 15 years from a sentence of…

  2. GODWELL NHAMO KHOSA And ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED And CHRISTOPHERSON TENDEKAYI MUNDEMBE

    Chinhoyi High Court · HCC37-23 · 07 2023

    The brief narrative is that the applicant entered into a lease agreement with the 1st respondent a juristic entity on the 5th of March 2018. The terms and conditions pertaining to the renewal and termination of the lease where embodied…

  3. CONSTANTINE CHAZA versus MUNASHE CHIBANDA N.O. and THE STATE

    Harare High Court · HH 452-23 · 07 2023

    The applicant is an accused in a criminal trial at Harare Magistrates Courts in which he faces two counts of fraud as defined in s 136 (a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) act [Chapter 9:23] hereinafter referred to…

  4. THE STATE versus REMEMBER RANGWANI and PASSMORE RANGWANI

    Harare High Court · HH 455-23 · 07 2023

    The deceased was a towering figure. He terrorised the two accused persons after they accused him of selling fetid meat. He unfortunately came out of the fight he had started and thought he would easily win worse. Remember and Passmore…

  5. ZIMBABWE LEAF TOBACCO COMPANY (PVT) LTD versus ROBERT ALLEN STOKES and DANIEL TIVARDAR N.O

    Harare High Court · HH 458-23 · 07 2023

    This is an application for setting aside of an arbitral award in terms of Article 34 (2) (b) (ii) of the Model Law as set out in the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]. The applicant premises its application on the ground…

  6. QUARRYING ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED v 1) SOUTHERN GRANITE (PRIVATE) LIMITED (2)MINISTEROF MINES &MINING DEVELOPMENT(3) THE PROVINCIAL MINING DIRECTOR

    Supreme Court · SC74/23 · 07 2023

    The facts of this matter are common cause. The appellant and thefirst respondent are companies duly incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. On 22 June 2007, the second respondent published a forfeiture notice in terms of which part…

  7. BATSIRAI MAMBAYO v OLD MUTUAL SHARED SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Supreme Court · SC75/23 · 07 2023

    The appellant was employed by the respondent as an accounts administrator.She was also a member of the workers committee. She was charged with misconduct in terms of the Old Mutual Code of Conduct and Grievance Procedure,(in particular s 15.9), for…

  8. LAW SOCIETY OF ZIMBABWE Versus (1) PARLIAMENT OF ZIMBABWE (2) THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE (3) THE SPEAKER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY (4) PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE (5) MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (6) ATTORNEY-GENERAL N.O

    Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe · CCZ -10-23 · 07 2023

    The applicant approaches this Court under s 167(2)(d) as read with s 85(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. It seeks an order declaring that the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No1 Bill, alternatively, the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment No1 Act, and…

  9. TENDAI MASHAMANDA v (1) BARIADE INVESTMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (2) PUWAYI CHIUTSI (3) THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS (4) THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT (5) ELLIOT ROGERS (6) ATTORNEY GENERAL ZIMBABWE

    Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe · CCZ- 09-23 · 07 2023

    The Applicant was aggrieved and has approached this Court for direct access in terms of s 167 (5) (a) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe. The Applicant submits that three of his fundamental rights enshrined in Chapter 4 of the Constitution…

  10. FUNGAI MUNYAMA versus VIMBAI MUPONDA

    Harare High Court · HH 453-23 · 07 2023

    The applicant alleges that on 7 September 2020, he entered into an agreement of sale with the respondent in respect of Lot 4 of Geluk Farm, Beatrice, aforesaid. In addition, the applicant avers that the respondent breached the agreement by…

  11. (1) BEATRICE MTETWA (2) TAWANDA NYAMBIRAI (3) MZOKUTHULA MBUYISA (4) DOUGLAS COLTART v (1) RUNGWANDI ANDRUJUWA LEGAL PRACTITIONERS (2)TENDAI MURAMBIDZA

    Supreme Court · SC72/23 · 07 2023

    The appellants are partners of the law firm practising as Mtetwa&Nyambirai Legal Practitioners (“Mtetwa&Nyambirai”). The first respondent is a legal firm, whose principal is Mark Rujuwa, a former associate at the appellant’s law firm. The second respondent was previously employed…

  12. ITAYI MARUFU VERSUS TROJAN NICKEL MINE (PVT) LTD

    Labour Court · LC-H-225-23 · 07 2023

    Appellant was employed by the Respondent as its Concentrator Manager. Allegations of misconduct were levelled against him it being alleged that he had wrongfully and unlawfully made personal purchases using the company system without the requisite authority to do so.…

  13. PROSECUTOR GENERAL versus FRANK CHITUKUTUKU and NYASHA CHITUKUTUKU and HOTSPIKES (PVT)LTD and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS and REGISTRAR OF MOTOR VEHICLES

    Harare High Court · HH 449-23 · 07 2023

    1. This is an application for a civil forfeiture order brought in terms of SS 79 and 80 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24](“ the Money Laundering Act” or simply “ the Act”). The targeted…

  14. STAR PRECIOUS JENAMI (formerly NDORO) versus SHONGWE MICHAEL NDORO and TUNIKA PHAENAH MKAHANANA and LESEDI VIMBAINASHE NDORO and DAKARAI SHONGWE JUNIOR NDORO

    Harare High Court · HH 451-23 · 07 2023

    In this matter the marriage between the plaintiff and first defendant was dissolved by a decree of this court on 26 November 2019 in an initial action where the parties were only the plaintiff, first and second defendant. The second…

  15. SALZMAN ET CIE SA v (1) MANOJKUMARJIVAN (2) THE SHERIFF OF ZIMBABWE

    Supreme Court · SC70/23 · 07 2023

    The appellant is a limited liability company registered and incorporated in terms of the laws of the Republic of Panama. It has its head office or principal place of business in Switzerland. The first respondent was one of the directors…

  16. GRAIN MARKERTING BOARD v INNOCENT BEREMAURO

    Supreme Court · SC71/23 · 07 2023

    The respondent was employed by the appellant as the resident fitter and turner at its depot in Lions Den, Mashonaland West. His duty was to carry out repair and maintenance works on the plant. The works included welding and general…

  17. CONSTRUTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND VS. NTANDO IVIN SIBANDA AND NTANDO IVIN SIBANDA VS CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND

    Labour Court · LC-H-224-23 · 07 2023

    The Respondent is a Risk and Compliance Manager under the employ of the Appellant. On 11 March 2021 the Respondent spilled tea on his office laptop leading to the machine malfunctioning and it was sent for repairs at the cost…

  18. JOHN TRANOS MATUKUTIRE versus SHADRECK MUNATSI and FAITH MUNATSI and RATIDZAI MATUKUTIRE t/a GLOBAL VILLAGE/6

    Harare High Court · HH 440-23 · 07 2023

    On 10 May 2018 the applicant sold to the first and second respondents [“the respondents”] a piece of land from a certain housing development project by him in Good Hope Township of Harare. The sale was in terms of a…

  19. BINGA RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL versus MOSES MUDIMBA N.O. (In his capacity as Executor Dative of the Estate of the Late Shadreck Kilson Mudimba DRB 31/2008) and MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS and MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS

    Harare High Court · HH 445-23 · 07 2023

    The applicant seeks the rescission of a default judgment that was granted against it on 11 May 2022, under HC 4637/20. That default judgment was granted following the applicant’s failure to file its plea within the period prescribed by the…

  20. BARRINGTON RESOURCES (PVT) LTD versus PULSERATE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and PROVINCIAL MINING DIRECTOR MASHONALAND EAST and MINISTER OF MINES AND MINING DEVELOPMENT and OFFICER COMMANDING ZRP MASHONALAND EAST and HOPE MINING SYNDICATE

    Harare High Court · HH 446-23 · 07 2023

    The facts upon which the present application was predicated were given as follows:- Around May 2020, the applicant said it started noticing illegal mining activity around the claims. Upon investigation it determined that the illegal activities were being sponsored by…