Legal research

Court Judgments

Search judgments by case, court, year, lawyer or summary.

Showing 3,361–3,380 of 12,680 judgments

  1. NMB BANK LIMITED AND AURTHER MUNHUURIPI, ELVIS MUDZENGERERE N.O.

    Labour Court · LC-H-113-23 · 03 2023

    The First Respondent is employed by the Appellant. First Respondent was suspended from employment by the Appellant. The Appellant also reported the matter to the police resulting in the arrest of the First Respondent. The First Respondent’s bail conditions barred…

  2. SHILLAH MANYEWU (in her capacity as the Executrix Dative of Estate Late Sharai Chizema DR number 2309/19) and JACKSON CHIKOORE versus CALVIN MPOFU and MINISTER OF NATIONAL HOUSING & SOCIAL AMENITIES and AROSUME PROPERTY INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD and SALLY MUGABE HOUSING COOPERATIVE and THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS N.O and THE SURVEYOR GENERAL N.O

    Harare High Court · HH 197-23 · 03 2023

    Applicants have approached this Court on an urgent basis seeking an interdict.

  3. FARAI BWATIKONA ZIZHOU versus THE SHERIFF OF ZIMBABWE N.O. and RITA MARQUE MBATHA and REALTY WORLD (PVT) LTD

    Harare High Court · HH201-23 · 03 2023

    The applicant and the second respondent have a long history of litigation between themselves. The second respondent has in her favour a judgment against the applicant under Case No HH 675/21 wherein she was awarded damages for sexual harassment to…

  4. PATIENCE NOTHANDO MAKONI and LESLEY BONIFACE MAKONI versus CITY OF HARARE and THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT

    Harare High Court · HH-253-23 · 03 2023

    The applicants seek an order compelling the first respondent to transfer to them within three months of the order, ownership of a certain piece of land situate in Harare called Stand 3225 Bluffhill Township. The claim is based on an…

  5. RIOZIM LIMITED v NIGEL DIXON – WARREN N.O

    Supreme Court · SC21-23 · 03 2023

    This is an application in terms of r 43 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 (the Rules) for the condonation of non-compliance with r 38 (1) of the Rules and for extension of time within which to appeal. The…

  6. THE STATE versus ROBERT MAKUVAZA

    Masvingo High Court · HMA 06-23 · 03 2023

    The main issue in this matter is how the accused allegedly assaulted the now deceased leading to the now deceased’s death. The accused is facing the charge of murder as defined in section 47 (1) of the Criminal Law (Codification…

  7. BLOSSOM VIEW HOLDINGS LIMITED Versus NU AERO (PVT) LIMITED t/a Fly Africa Zimbabwe And HOPALONG CASSIDY CHITARIRISO MUGWAGWA

    Harare High Court · HH-288-23 · 03 2023

    On the 17th day of March 2023, I handed down judgment ex tempore as follows 1. The respondents shall, jointly and severally with the one paying the other to be absolved pay applicant the total sum of US$ 2,500,000 (Two…

  8. TONGOGARA RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL v SITHEMBISO NDIRIPO

    Supreme Court · SC 19-23 · 03 2023

    This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Labour Court (“the court a quo), sitting at Gweru, wherein the court a quo upheld an appeal by the respondent on the basis that she had been improperly charged and…

  9. (1) PEPPY MOTORS (PRIVATE) LIMITED t/a AGRITECH (2) SABRINO SARPO (3) TONY SARPO v 1) RUZIRUN INVESTMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED (2) JOICE TEURAI ROPA MUJURU (3) THE SHERRIFF (N.O)

    Supreme Court · SC 20-23 · 03 2023

    This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court which confirmed a provisional order that the first and second respondents had satisfied their judgment debt denominated in US Dollars by making payments in RTGs dollars converted at…

  10. THE STATE and EMELDA MARAZANI

    Harare High Court · HH 192-23 · 03 2023

    Emelda Marazani (the accused) a thirty year old mother of five children appeared before us accused of a quadruple homicide in terms of s 47 (1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [chapter 9:23] (The Code). The indictment…

  11. BENJAMIN TAZVIVINGA VERSUS O.K. ZIMBABWE LIMITED

    Labour Court · LC-H-81-23 · 03 2023

    The Negotiating Committee for the National Employment Council for the Commercial Sectors errored on the facts and law itself, when it upheld the decision of the company (OK Zimbabwe) to dismiss claimant. The claimant did not perform his work in…

  12. MAROVANYIKA F.V. (N.O.) VERSUS MOREYEAR INVESTMENTS COMPANY (PVT) LTD t/a MORE HARVEST AND JOHNSON MAPIRA

    Labour Court · LC-H-80-23 · 03 2023

    This is an application for the confirmation of a ruling in the matter between Johnson Mapira and Moreyear Investments Company. The background to the matter is that Mapira lost his job with Moreyear on notice. Aggrieved by the job loss…

  13. NIXON MAWIRE VERSUS INSTATOLL ZIBABWE (PTY) LTD

    Labour Court · LC-H-79-23 · 03 2023

    On the 1th August 2023 Respondent’s disciplinary authority issued a final written warning to Appellant. The warning is valid for 12(twelve) months, Appellant then appealed to this Court in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent…

  14. ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY AND ABIGAIL MUKAHIWA

    Labour Court · LC-H-110-23 · 03 2023

    Mr. Mafongoya submitted that the appropriate penalty in the matter was not dismissal. He referred to section 65 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe which provides for citizens being accorded the right to fair labour practices. He also referred to the…

  15. THE STATE Versus KEFASI NDEBELE

    Bulawayo High Court · HB 120-23 · 03 2023

    The accused person faces a charge of murder, it being alleged that on the 23rd of March 2020 and at Makokoba Compound, Makhudu village in Mphoengs, the accused stabbed Linnet Siziba once on the upper part of the left thigh…

  16. NARVICK NHOWA versus THE STATE

    Harare High Court · HH 189-23 · 03 2023

    The applicant is facing three counts of robbery as defined in s 126 of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act [Chapter 9:23] also known as the Criminal Law Code. The Form 242 reflects that the applicant is jointly charged…

  17. ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY APPELLANT And KUDAKWASHE MARECHA RESPONDENT

    Labour Court · LC-H-94-23 · 03 2023

    This is an appeal against the decision of a labour officer acquitting respondent from wrongdoing. The appellant employer was aggrieved by that decision. It appealed to this Court.

  18. 1) HC 904/22 THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE And WILTON AND MAKS (PVT) LTD Versus EARLBAT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD T/A GIDZA CREDIT 2) HC 1080/22 THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE And WELLINGTON MAKONESE Versus EARLBAT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD T/A GIDZA CREDIT 3) HC 1081/22 THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE And FRANCIS BHUNU Versus EARLBAT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD T/A GIDZA CREDIT 4) HC 1082/22 THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE And PETER KAPIRINGISHE Versus EARLBAT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD (JUDGMENT CREDITOR) T/A GIDZA CREDIT 5) HC 1083/22 THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE And JON`S ENGINEERING (PVT) LTD Versus EARLBAT INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD T/A GIDZA CREDIT

    Harare High Court · HH 186-23 · 03 2023

    Five (5) different parties laid claim to various chattels seized by applicant (“the Sheriff”), in execution of a judgment in favour of the judgment creditor (“Gidza Credit”) against the judgment debtor referred herein as “Welli-Well”.The 5 different claims were consolidated…

  19. MORGAN PARADZA versus MASHONALAND TOBACCO COMPANY

    Harare High Court · HH 187-23 · 03 2023

    This is an application for a declaratur in terms of s 14 of the High Court Act. The background facts are that the applicant was employed by the respondent, Mashonaland Tobacco Company (“MTC”) under a fixed term contract from 2006,…

  20. Case 1 KASOMA TRUST and MARSZIM TRUST and LEADERSHIP INVESTMENT (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus HAYLMA TRUST and KENNIAS SIBANDA and ANTHONY CHIHIYA and BILTRANS SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED Case 2 AUTO SEAL TRUST HC 1270/21 and HAYLMA TRUST and KENNIAS SIBANDA and ANTHONY CHIHIYA and JANITA RAMA and RASHI D’ ALMEIDA and AUTO SEAL ZIMBABWE (PRIVATE) LIMITED

    Harare High Court · HH 188-23 · 03 2023

    This judgment is a product of two matters that were consolidated and heard as one. The issues at stake and the interests of the parties involved herein converge. At the centre of the dispute in both cases is an Extra…