Legal research
Court Judgments
Search judgments by case, court, year, lawyer or summary.
Showing 661–680 of 12,680 judgments
-
NASHE FAMILY TRUST versus CHARLES CHIWARA and THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS N.O and THE SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE N.O and BARBARA CHIVANDIRE and THE TRUSTEES OF THE CHIWARA FAMILY TRUST and YOLANDA RUVARASHE ROPAFADZO CHIWARA and TANYARADZWA KUDAKWASHE CLELSEA CHIWARA and PARTRIC MAVHURA
Harare High Court · HH-596-25 · 09 2025
The parties in this application are cited in the heading above. The applicant is Nashe Family Trust, so cited. I say so cited because the issue of whether the applicant has legal status to sue or be sued was raised…
-
SIMBARASHE TAVENGWA and NGONIDZASHE MUTIBA and TITUS CHATUKUTA and RODWELL VANHUKWAVO MUTINYA versus THE STATE and MARITA SOPHIA BEKKER and MARDECAR PRIVATE LIMITED versus CECILIA JOHANNA BEKKER and GOLLOP & BLANK and THE MASTER OF HIGH COURT NO
Harare High Court · HH559-25 · 09 2025
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Magistrates Court sitting at Harare convicting the appellants of six counts of robbery as defined in s 126 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (“the Criminal Law…
-
PROBOTTLERS PVT(LTD) APPLICANT AND BRUCE CHITUNHU 1st RESPONDENT AND KISHIAL PATEL N.O. 2nd RESPONDENT AND DEAN MAJAYA N.O. 3rd RESPONDENT AND PROBOTTLERS (PVT) LTD DISCIPLINARY 4th RESPONDENT COMMITTEE N. O.
Labour Court · LC-H-347-25 · 09 2025
The matter was placed as composite application for condonation and extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal and an application for leave to appeal. The application was filed on 27 March 2025. The applicant was seeking…
-
CAROLINE SITHOLE VS YELLOW COB ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE LIMITED)
Labour Court · LC-H-348-25 · 09 2025
This is an appeal in which the following order is sought: That the appeal succeeds with costs. That the determination of the arbitration court be and is hereby set aside. That the decision of the appeals officer be and is…
-
STATE versus GEORGE MASENDU
Harare High Court · HH-647-25 · 09 2025
The above record was placed before me on automatic review of the criminal proceedings in terms of section 57(1) of the Magistrates Court Act [Chapter 7:06] as read with section 29(1) of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. The accused…
-
THE STATE Versus TLOU FREDRICK
Bulawayo High Court · HB 162/25 · 09 2025
The accused was convicted by a Regional Magistrate, for smuggling.
-
STATE Versus THEMBELENKOSINI MLOTSHWA
High Court of Bulawayo · HB 161-25 · 09 2025
The accused appears before the court on a charge of murder wherein it is alleged that on 1st January 2025 the accused stabbed the deceased one Khulekani Mjaho once on the stomach with an okapi knife, an AK 47 Press…
-
MICHAEL MANZINI (1) and SAMUEL CHITENDERANO RWAMBIWA (2) versus NEDBANK ZIMBABWE LIMITED (formerly MERCHANT BANK OF CENTRAL AFRICA)
Harare High Court · HH-572-25 · 09 2025
On 18 September 2025, the court, after hearing oral arguments from the first applicant and counsel for the respondent, handed down an ex tempore judgment, the operative part of which was that the application was dismissed with no order as…
-
ALVESTONE ESTATE (1985) (PRIVATE) LIMITED versus TRACY MUTINHIRI and HONOURABLE N. T. MTSHIYA (RETIRED) N.O. (ARBITRATOR)
Harare High Court · HH-574-25 · 09 2025
This is an application by Alvestone Estate (1985) (Pvt) Ltd (“the Applicant”) to partially set aside an arbitral award pursuant to Article 34(2)(iii) of the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15] (the “Act”). The applicant contends that the arbitrator (Hon. MTSHIYA J…
-
SURFACE WILMAR PRIVATE LIMITED versus WINDMILL PRIVATE LIMITED
Harare High Court · HH-575-25 · 09 2025
This a court application for a recovery of debt. Applicant and respondent are both companies duly registered in accordance with the laws of Zimbabwe. Applicant seeks to recover a debt that is due and payable by the respondent.
-
GRACE NDABAMBI versus CHITEPO KASINAUBARE
Harare High Court · HH-576-25 · 09 2025
The parties entered into an unregistered customary law union on 30 October 1998. Four issues were referred to trial in this matter canvassing the following: a) Whether or not there is still an extant customary law union so as to…
-
JOSHUA MUZA TANGAWABAIWA v (1) EDWARD TARUSENGA N.O ( in his capacity as the Executor Testamentary of the ESTATE LATE SOPHIA TANGAWABAIWA DR 3019) (2) MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT (3) REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Supreme Court · SC87-25 · 09 2025
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court of Zimbabwe (the court a quo). Before the court a quo, the first respondent, acting in his capacity as the executor testamentary of the estate of the late…
-
WILSON TENDAI NYABONDA versus ARISTON HOLDINGS LIMITED and LEON NORTIER
Harare High Court · HH 677/24 · 09 2025
-
LEONARD KAREMBA versus PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 1st RESPONDENT AND MINISTRY OF LANDS, AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES, WATER AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2nd RESPONDENT AND INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT 3rd RESPONDENT AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF ZIMBABWE 4th
Labour Court · LCH386-25 · 09 2025
The Applicant made a composite application for review and quantification of arrear remuneration and damages for loss of employment to this Court. The application was never opposed by any of the Respondents despite service of the Application upon all the…
-
PHILLEMON MUNYARADZI CHAMBURUKA 1ST APPLICANT THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE STAFF DISCIPLINARY COMMIITTEE PROFESSOR A MAMVUTO N.O 2ND RESPONDENT THE MINISTER OF HIGHER & TERTIARY EDUCATION, INNOVATION, SCIENCE &TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 3RD RESPONDENT
Labour Court · LC-H-344-25 · 09 2025
The applicants were employed by the first respondent as lectures and were members of the Association of University Teachers (AUT). This is a trade union that represents academic staff. On 2 April 2025 they embarked on a ballot system in…
-
TONDERAI NYAPOKOTO APPELLANT AND SHERENI TRANSPORT (PVT) LTD FIRST RESPONDENT C.V CHINEMBRI N.O. SECOND RESPONDENT NEC FOR TRANSPORT OPERATING INDUSTRY THIRD RESPONDENT
Labour Court · LC-H-345-25 · 09 2025
This is a combined application for review and appeal against the award of the Hon. Arbitrator C.V Chinembiri N.O.The appellant/applicant was employed by the 1st respondent as an international driver from January 2025. He lodged claims of unfair dismissal after…
-
METALLON GOLD ZIMBABWE PRIVATE LIMITED t/a MAZOWE MINE AND SHAMVA MINE and THE SHERIFF OF ZIMBABWE NO and ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION DISTRIBUTION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
Harare High Court · HH-568-25 · 09 2025
The applicant is a duly incorporated company according to the laws of Zimbabwe. The first respondent is the Sheriff for Zimbabwe whose duties include inter-alia the execution of orders and judgments of this court. The second respondent is Zimbabwe Electricity…
-
MAZOWE MINING COMPANY PVT LTD versus HUNGWE MINING SYNDICATE and WORKERS CONSORTIUM MINING SYNDICATE and MARTINMANG MINING SYNDICATE and MASHONALAND MINING SYNDICATE and VISION 2030 MINING SYNDICATE and KAT MINING SYNDICATE and BATMAN MINING SYNDICATE and SANDSPRING MINING SYNDICATE and NUCLEOUS MINING SYNDICATE and RUFARO MINING SYNDICATE and COMMONWEALTH MINING SYNDICATE and MMS MINING SYNDICATE and STONEMABLE MINING SYNDICATE and JCB MINING SYNDICATE and MADSAY INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED and LICANTA MINING PRIVATE LIMITED and SOS WEST MINING SYNDICATE and GUDGAL MINING SYNDICATE and GABRIELLA MINING SYNDICATE
Harare High Court · HH-569-25 · 09 2025
The applicant is a duly registered company in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. All respondents save for respondents 15 and 16 are registered mining syndicates whilst the 15th and 16th respondents are like the applicant, registered companies. The dispute…
-
RAPHAEL MATINYARARE versus TENDAI MATINYARARE
Harare High Court · HH-570/25 · 09 2025
Applicant and respondent were previously married in terms of the Marriages Act [Chapter 5:17]. A decree of divorce and ancillary relief was granted in HCH 328/13. Respondent was granted spousal maintenance of USD 300.00 per month until she remarries or…
-
JAMES CHAMISA versus CITY OF HARARE
Harare High Court · HH-571-25 · 09 2025
[1] The plaintiff sued out a summons against the defendant claiming an order declaring the conduct of the municipal police unlawful; payment of USD$31, 830.00 being damages for medical expenses, assault, pain, shock, suffering and contumelia he allegedly suffered because…
