Browse Electronic ResourcesCourt Judgements
Legal research
Court Judgments
Search judgments by case, court, year, lawyer or summary.
Showing 10,761–10,780 of 12,680 judgments
-
MASIMBA MUSONI versus THE STATE
Harare High Court · HH301-13 · 09 2013
The applicant seeks leave of this court to appeal against the judgment of this court dismissing his appeal against both his conviction and sentence by way of a chamber application. That application does not include the proposed grounds of appeal…
-
FRANCISCA MUSHAYA versus JOHN WITIKENI and EDITH CHIWARIDZO and SHERIFF FOR ZIMBABWE
Harare High Court · HH317-13 · 09 2013
The applicant seeks a provisional order in the following terms:- “TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT 1. Execution of the order under case (number) HC 2326/08 is hereby stayed pending finalisation of the application for rescission of judgment.
-
EDSON MURINGAPASI – Appellant And SAVANNA TOBACCO – Respondent
Labour Court · LC/H/700/2013 · 09 2013
The appeal was noted against the arbitral award handed down on 10thMay 2013.The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Senior Promotions Officer in the Sales Marketing Department. His contract of employment was terminated following a retrenchment exercise which…
-
BRIAN MALGAS Appellant And NEWWORLD PROPERTY MANAGERS Respondent
Labour Court · LC/H/681/13 · 09 2013
This matter came as an appeal by the employee against his dismissal by the Respondent company on allegations of contravening the industry code of conduct. On the date of the hearing of the appeal 2 points in limine were raised…
-
HSIAO CHENG LIU versus HUNG YUEN WONG and SHUWAI WONG and YUYU TSOI
Harare High Court · HH314-13 · 09 2013
The plaintiff is a businessmen and a director of a number of private companies operating in Zimbabwe, South Africa and Hong Kong. For quite sometime he has been operating his various businesses in partnership with the defendants who are Chinese…
-
MULTI-MANUFACTURERS (PVT) LTD - Applicant Versus WILLARD VONO
Labour Court · LC/H/447/2013 · 09 2013
The matter was placed before me as an application for upliftment of the bar operating against the Applicant by virtue of its failure to file Heads of Argument.
-
PRISCILLA TOGAREPI Appellant And BEACH CONSULTANCY COMPANY (PVT) LTD Respondent t/a AVIATION GROUND SERVICE (AGS)
Labour Court · LC/H/449/13 · 09 2013
Appellant was employed by Respondent as a Shift Supervisor. Appellant’s duties included issuing invoices to customers and in the absence of the cashier, also handle cash.
-
RICHARD CHAPANGA and GODWELL CHAPANGA and CLEMENCE CHAPANGA and OBERT CHAPANGA and CLEOPAS CHAPANGA versus MULTIPEST SERVICES (PVT) LTD and THE SHERIFF
Harare High Court · HH320-13 · 09 2013
This is an urgent chamber application for a provisional interdict. The facts are that on 10 July 2013 I dealt with the matter on the unopposed roll. The applicant who is the first respondent in this matter had applied for…
-
THE STATE versus 1. TUNGAMIRAI MADZOKERE 2. YVONNE MUSARURWA 3. REBECCAMFUKENI 4. LAST MAYENGEHAMA 5. LAZAROUS MAYENGEHAMA 6. GABRIEL SHUMBA 7. PHENEAS NHATARIKWA 8. STEPHEN TAKAIDZWA 9. STENFORD MANGWIRO 10. CYNTHEA MANJORO 11. STENFORD MAYENGEHAMA 12. LINDA MUSIYAMHANJE 13. TAFADZWA BILLIAT 14. SIMON MUDIMU 15. ZWELIBANZI DUBE 16. SIMON MAPANZURE 17. EDWIN MUINGIRI 18. AUGASTINE TENGANYIKA 19. FRANCIS VAMBAI 20. NYADZAWO GAPARA 21. AUDREY SYDNEY 22. JEPHIAS MOYO 23. ABINA RUTSITO 24. TENDAI MAXWELL CHINYAMA 25. MEMORY NCUBE 26. KERINA GWESHE 27. SOLOMON MADZORE 28. LOVEMORE TARUVINGA MAGAYA 29. PAUL NGANEROPA.
Harare High Court · HH337-13 · 09 2013
The accused persons stand charged with murder as defined in s 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Cap. 9:23]. In the alternative or concurrently they are charged with public violence as defined in s 36 of the…
-
M. KAMANDA and B. GUMUNYU versus SIBKEY INVESTMENTS and THE DEPUTY SHERIFF MASVINGO N.O.
Harare High Court · HH310-13 · 09 2013
The applicants and the first respondent maintained a landlord-tenant relationship. The relationship was based on an agreement of lease which the parties concluded on 4 October, 2006.
-
CONSTABLE SIBANDA K. 067776T and CONSTABLE LUNGA M. 067848 X and CONSTABLE INSPECTOR TARUSIKIRA 049943K and CONSTABLE KALANI E. 070453D and ASSISTANT INSPECTOR DUBE 049758J And SERGENT HWAMI 062528P and SERGENT CHIBORA T. 063910R and ASSISTANT INSPECTOR DUBE D. 05277Y And ASSISTANT INSPECTOR MOYO E. 053645J and ASSISTANT INSPECTOR MAPHOSA F 983210F and ASSISTANT INSPECTOR CHATUKUTA L 054539F and ASSISTANT INSPECTOR MJIKWA M 066410J and SERGENT MUKUKU E. 062221F and SERGEANT MUTANDAVARI M. 983539N and CONSTABLE CHIRONDA L. 070587Z and CONSTABLE SENDO A 987951J and CONSTABLE NDUDZO F. 074217V and CONSTABLE KAWERENGA S. 067297Y and CONSTABLE DHLAMINI S. 072325N and CONSTABLE CHITSUNGE C. 068649S and CONSTABLE MBEDZI G. 077292M and CONSTABLE MAUNGA M 989746K and CONSTABLE MASIMBITI M. 067770M and CONSTABLE MAPHANA P. 074210M versus TRIAL OFFICERS and THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE and THE CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS
Harare High Court · HH302-13 · 09 2013
This is an urgent chamber application in which the first to eighth applicants seek the following relief:-
-
TALKMORE CHIGWIKO versus LEONARD CHIGWIKO and POSE DAHWA and MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT and DIRECTOR OF HOUSING, MARONDERA
Harare High Court · HH298-13 · 09 2013
This is an application for the setting aside of the sale to and cession into the name of the second respondent of rights, title and interest in an immovable property known as No. 5 Gura Way, Marondera. The stand number…
-
ZIMBABWE CONCRESS OF TRADE UNIONS versus OFFICER COMMANDING POLICE HARARE CENTRAL DISTRICT CHIEF SUPRITENDENT N. SAUNYAMA (N.O) and COMMISSSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE and CO-MINISTERS OF HOME AFFAIRS
Harare High Court · HH297-13 · 09 2013
The applicant is the registered conglomeration of trade unions and is engaged in the furtherance of its members’ interests. The first respondent is the regulating authority for Harare Central in terms of the Public Order and Security Act [Cap 11:17]…
-
SARAH ZIMBANDE versus GIBSON KAHOMWE
Harare High Court · HH294-13 · 09 2013
The appellant appealed against the decision of a Magistrate who ordered her to return the cattle, goats and money which had been attached in execution to satisfy a judgment which had been granted in her favour by the Chief’s court.…
-
THE STATE versus DANIEL NJOLOMA
Harare High Court · HH292-13 · 09 2013
The accused is a 39 year old foreigner cherishing his domicile in Blantyre Malawi. On the night of 30 June 2013 he was driving a Volvo BUSSCAR bus registration number BS 358 which was towing a trailer registration number BR…
-
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and MUSAKWA BILLIARD N.O versus NEWMAN CHIADZWA
Harare High Court · HH287-13 · 09 2013
This is an application for rescission of default judgment brought in terms of Order 9 rule 63 of the High Court Rules 1971. The application is opposed. The relief sought is that:
-
JOSE MARCELINO GONCALVES and M.M. PRETORIUS P/L versus CHAMUNORWA CHARLES MUTYAMBIZI and THE ASSISTANT ADDITTIONAL SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT, HARARE
Harare High Court · HH276-13 · 09 2013
CHIGUMBA J: This is an urgent chamber application in which the applicants seek the following relief: TERMS OF ORDER SOUGHT That you show cause to this Honorable Court why a final order should not be made on the following terms:-…
-
WALKTALL (PVT) LTD versus SHEPHERD TUNDIYA
Harare High Court · HH346-13 · 09 2013
This is an oral application made in chambers at the instance of the plaintiff on the date set down for a pre-trial conference. On 26 February 2013 the parties appeared before me duly represented by their respective legal practitioners of…
-
WILLIE TAPERA MHISHI and THE MEDICAL & DENTAL PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL OF ZIMBABWE
Harare High Court · HH340-13 · 09 2013
This is an opposed court application. The facts of the matter are as follows; The applicant is a qualified surgeon practising as such in Harare. He is a registered member of the respondent. On 15 January 2009, applicant lodged a…
-
CONCERN WORLDWIDE - APPLICANT ZIMBABWE Versus EDSON BERE - RESPONDENT
Labour Court · LC/H/415/2013 · 09 2013
The court is satisfied that this application has no merit for the following reasons: 1) The court correctly found that there was no lawful instruction and clearly articulated its reasons for stating so, thus a superior court is not likely…
